Thread:Ahsan1444/@comment-43604755-20190909173317/@comment-37875052-20190910152014

Shadowslayer of the northern legion wrote: Warrior Of Time wrote: One more thing Ahsan. Please understand that I'm not blaming criticizing in this case. But when I was comparing the weapon edits made by hail to shadow and shadowslayer. Hail to Shadow was updating the whole page just like you do for the quests. shadowslayer had just seen the disclaimer thing and only was changing the share word. As I said it is no one's fault here. What I'm trying to say is the pages edited by shadowslayer are actually not fully proofread yet except the disclaimer as you may have observed. Problem is those pages are considered as done and neither you nor hail to Shadow are going to do them again. And this will leave them incomplete. What I suggest is check those pages again if they were left.

My main suggestion is If a single person is proofreading like you are doing yourself for quests it is not a problem as it will be uniform. but if more than one person is doing pages of a same category like those both did for weapon. Then you guys must edit one page each and discuss all the changes that must be done. You can then after discussion carry out the changes in rest of the pages. This will assure Uniformity in its and no content would be overlooked. As you guys can point out each others mistakes or things which your overlooked would it matter if i put it as said edit in contributions? (example: "changed call of the cursed on light brim page to light brim for description") That would still lead to confusion and double work for proofreading the same page. I said you both can I get one page each and discuss the procedure and changes common to all pages. Then you can proceed with the rest of them